Thanks Ted for pointing this out. The question is "[are you] vouching that all of Sentry's development is > happening in the open and Sentry development decisions are not being taken > offlist?"
Yes, to the best of my knowledge, that is the case. Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Arvind Prabhakar <arv...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > Just to be clear - you're > > > vouching that all of Sentry's development is happening in the open, and > > > Sentry development decisions are not being taken offlist? > > > > > </snip> > > > > > > Yes, in my best judgement, I feel the Sentry community is flourishing and > > very welcoming of interactions with the broader community of users and > > developers. They happen to be Jira centric and I agree that it may not > seem > > to be as welcoming as a non-Jira centric project. That said, the > project's > > focus is low-level security integration and it is not something that the > > users interact with directly - which in my opinion naturally fits the > Jira > > centric model. > > > > Arvind, > > Since we just came off of a misunderstanding about an ambiguous statement, > I would like to point out that your response did not actually answer the > question. > > It might be good to nip any further misunderstanding in the bud by > clarifying what you said. > > The question is "[are you] vouching that all of Sentry's development is > happening in the open and Sentry development decisions are not being taken > offlist?" >
