Geez, dude. Ease up. "all of us" only meant the four of us voting -1.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: > What? Is this now an implicit ASF incubation policy? So, if I understand > you correctly, you want to exclude potentials from the incubation process > based on this? And you don't want this potential have their own way of > working? > > Even though 18 peers voted +1 for having this potential entering the ASF as > a podling. This is not a code change requiring consensus. This is a > procedural issue. > > No, you may not speak for all of us. If you want to speak for all on this > subject, go make it a dictat from the Board of the ASF. But are you sure > that then it is not also applicable to TLPs? > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > *OFBiz Extensions Marketplace* > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < > > bdelacre...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Henry Robinson <he...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > ... > > > > Binding -1s (4): > > > > Greg Stein > > > > Ralph Goers > > > > Roman Shaposhnik > > > > Konstantin Boudnik ... > > > > > > Please indicate how the issues that are behind these -1s have been > > > addressed. > > > > > > I might have missed something, just had a quick look at the VOTE > thread. > > > > > > > They have not been addressed. > > > > If I may speak for all of us: basically, we want to see podlings use CTR > > rather than begin with RTC. We believe that will grow a more inclusive > > community, which is one of the more serious problems that podlings tend > to > > run into. > > > > In this case, the podling is explicitly doing RTC, so we -1'd its > entrance > > to the ASF. > > > > Cheers, > > -g > > >
