That's a good suggestion Justin. I've updated the release instructions patch I've been working on (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-111 if you'd like to review) to include that.
What's the best way to have the 1.3.0 artifacts be reviewed? Should we do a small release 1.3.1 with source + binary to have them reviewed together? By the way, Justin, I released the 1.3.0 repository in Nexus before you last email went out. -Matt On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > Okay got it, thanks Marvin, I hadn't seen that. It sounds like we are > okay > > to release then given that the DataFu community already voted on and > > approved the JARs to be released. The vote is cancelled. > > It may still be useful to check that the connivance binary follows Apache > policy. For instance the NOTICE and LICENSE may need to be different from > the source release. It’s best to offer but the source and binary for review > at the same time. > > Thanks, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
