On 3/7/16, 6:05 AM, "Richard Downer" <rich...@apache.org> wrote:
>Alex, Justin, all, > >Thank you for your comments. With your comments in mind, I will make >this statement for the record: > >Regarding the subject of the Software Grant Agreement, download link: >https://github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn-cli/archive/b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4 >828783f07bec978a76b7be.zip >SHA1: 5b5ef46c56adfff8ca86cca04694d5abc10ec447 >SHA256: 0cfaac11df7075c723bfb982ed5852d790fa195dcfe67c9bbbd545f34df71770 > >The folder brooklyn-cli-b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be/br/Godeps >is *excluded* from the code grant; this folder contains bundled >dependencies licensed by 3rd parties using the MIT and BSD licenses. > >With this folder removed from the ZIP file using the command zip -d >FILENAME.zip >brooklyn-cli-b8b39e54ecbb7c12f4828783f07bec978a76b7be/br/Godeps\*, >the hashes become: >SHA1: 91fda2ca20c4b171985e1f5bb545ed8a236123dd >SHA256: 4de28b308ad09f0e5642b4cefdd54b1c91b255fecd00184763a7d260bf8ec12d > >I am updating the IP Clearance record with this same statement. > >Is this sufficient notice for the record to address your comments? I would hope it is sufficient, but I am not the person who can make the call. Other more senior folks may be able to make the call, but if you want to be more sure, I would ask on legal-discuss if this is a sufficient way to update an SGA. -Alex
