I did, the idea was to reuse asf charter (replacing ${PROJECT} by Johnzon),
ppmc vote was considered useless since everyone agreed and nobody objected
so we were at voting on IPMC step, did I miss something?


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2016-03-07 20:47 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>:

> Romain,
>
> Please review the graduation guide:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:42 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > 2016-03-07 20:08 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Usually graduation votes include things like the proposal.
> > >
> > > It seems like this wasn't particularly discussed on the dev list, and
> not
> > > voted on at the dev list...
> > >
> > >
> > Was not voted cause everyone agreed, it has been discussed twice and
> > acknowledged twice so a vote was not mandatory since there was a
> concensus
> > (
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-johnzon-dev/201603.mbox/browser
> > ).
> > Also Justin said we can just use the default ASF policy to graduate so we
> > don't need our own. Should we still write it?
> >
> >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:55 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We discussed on johnzon@ and the graduation is out next goal (there
> > was
> > > > several threads but the one triggering this vote is
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-johnzon-dev/201603.mbox/browser
> > > > ).
> > > >
> > > > I'd ilke the IPMC to recommend the resolution to the Board and
> > therefore
> > > > I'm asking for a vote for it.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 great!
> > > > [ ] +0 don't care
> > > > [ ] -1 cause...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Romain
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to