+1 The big thing here is to make easier for new podlings to follow the guidelines. What about creating a checklist and/or adding this branding details to the tasks in status template?
The logo is a bit more trickier, but the disclaimer should be something easy to monitor... On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > +1 > > Regards > JB > > > On 07/02/2016 04:06 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > >> All, >> >> As a follow up to the current discussions happening, I wanted to get >> opinions from the IPMC on whether or not the Incubator logo should be >> included in podling websites. >> >> Take https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016 as a summary >> of podling status. >> >> 29 podlings presently show the Incubator Logo. 1 podling uses a custom >> version of the logo. This means we're just above 50% matching. The >> branding guide indicates that this is a should, which essentially means >> that unless there's some strong reason to not include, it is to be >> included >> on the website. >> >> I believe the usage of the Incubator logo comes from including parent >> project logos on sub-project websites, where podlings are essentially >> sub-projects, but I can't find anything confirming this. >> >> If we are to require the logo to be present, we must spell out the URL to >> the logo to use. This may be a variety of logos, include transparency >> effects, with and without borders, but we should guide projects on where >> to >> find them. >> >> John >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co w: http://redlink.co
