To be concrete: up thread was mention of shm.c I found two shm.c files in the HAWQ repo. It says it came in as part of the SGA. I looked in PostGreSQL's repo, but didn't find shm.c in the same paths. So where did HAWQ's shm.c come from? I think that's what Justin is asking.
On 8/9/16, 4:32 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> Why? It would be perfectly fine for PG project to include, lets say an >>MIT >> source code. > >That would be compatible with our license. But what if they included GPL >or CDDL licensed software? > >> That's why I don't feel comfortable putting the overall PG licensed >>header there on my own. > >Nor should you if the files are not licensed that way. > >> I think we're talking slightly past each other -- I told you I do KNOW >>that they >> are licensed under the different ALv2 compatible license. > >The package as a whole is licensed that way. But you stated you didn’t >not know how that file is licensed it may be ALv2 or it may be something >else. Just as it has different copyright owner it also likely is under a >different license, whose terms are very likely to be APv2 compatible, but >may not be. > >Thanks, >Justin >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
