Thank you for the review, Justin. I have changed the subject so as not to clutter the VOTE thread.
> - One possible binary file that shouldn’t be in the source release? [15] (not > sure what this is) This (an another couple of things in your review) might stay the same in the next release, but be allowed (as I read it) under the licensing rules: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html How should we annotate those to clarify our beliefs to voters and reviewers? Another example of a confusing thing that might stay the same is the license and copyright on > 9 ./be/src/thirdparty/squeasel/squeasel.? This might not have been part of the SGA; I'll have to check. Assuming for the purposes of this question that it was not part of the software grant, how can we annotate that to clarify? Thanks, Jim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
