Ping, are there any other issues to be resolved ? Otherwise we would really like to have this reviewed in time for our session on Apache Big Data early next week.
Thanks On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 : > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. > 11.0-incubating-rc5/ > > It only contains the following now : > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5 > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.asc > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.md5 > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.sha > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5 > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.asc > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5 > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha > > > There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926 > > Based on this, here is my +1. > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','johndam...@apache.org');>> wrote: > >> Hi Deron, >> >> Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you some >> guidance. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/ >> (and >> i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect) >> >> In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the .asc, >> .sha1. and the .md5. Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure >> that's too important. >> >> The overall release contents are made up of: >> >> - Source ZIP file >> - POM file for the root of the project >> - The convenience binary zip >> - The convenience binary .tar.gz >> >> I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future. I think >> the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what is >> what in your release. If your release only included a single source zip, >> two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc and >> md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect. >> >> John >> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriks...@gmail.com');>> >> wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would it >> be >> > acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following >> with >> > their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could include >> > the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the dist >> > artifacts from 9 to 4. >> > >> > Source distribution: >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip >> > >> > Binary distribution with dependencies: >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip >> > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0. >> 11.0-incubating-rc5/ >> > >> > Thank you, >> > Deron >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1...@gmail.com');>> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean < >> jus...@classsoftware.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jus...@classsoftware.com');>> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the >> source >> > > > release >> > > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing >> > > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal >> requirements >> > > > > mandated by Apache. >> > > > >> > > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external person) >> > > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t >> > clarify >> > > > it. >> > > > >> > > >> > > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a README >> to >> > > clarify what are the artifacts being released. >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from >> > > > > our previous release >> > > > >> > > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess but >> > > still >> > > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have >> > > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing list: >> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache. >> > > org/msg01121.html >> > > >> > > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the release >> > > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the >> SystemML >> > > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of >> > > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid further >> > > confusion on the matter. >> > > >> > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Justin >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Luciano Resende >> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > -- Sent from my Mobile device
