This is what I'm trying to say with these sentences:
Those reviewing the releases will provide the release managers
with information about what is wrong with the release.
Release managers should consider issues reported as blocking, unless told
otherwise
by those reporting the issue.
I'd rather not use the term "pass" and I'd prefer if it were understood by
podlings that the default should be to try to fix the release, unless its
explicitly called out.
John
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:41 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:
> I like it -- nice and simple. +1 to Justin's suggestion. Also,
> consider adding a sentence or two
> around the fact that podlings *may* get a pass on some of the more
> stringent requirements
> of a full blown TLP release, but a) it is not guaranteed b) it is up
> to mentors/IPMC to define
> what is appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nice and simple I like it. Perhaps add text or a link that podling
> releases need to be voted on this list here before being released?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
