The traditional response to this issue is to grow the ipmc to incorporate more podling committers.
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 1:02 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > I agree that lack of IPMC votes is a problem. I don’t think that lowering > the bar to making a release is the solution. > > I wish that each IPMC member would personally commit to voting on two > release candidates per year. There are so many members of the IPMC that > this would easily cover all of the votes that come up. > > Julian > > > > On Apr 22, 2017, at 8:46 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > > > > Probably the wrong place for this but… > > > > What do people think about a governance change for approving releases > through the IPMC to wit: > > > > A week of no vote activity over the release proposal of a podling should > be considered a passing vote. In other words the IPMC is to become a > vetoing group. > > > > I propose this for 2 reasons: 1) lack of votes or attention from the > IPMC seems all too prevalent and puts an undo drag on the energy and > velocity of community involvement. 2) the release has already been voted on > and checked by at least 3 PMC members of the podling (which has ASF mentors > in most all cases) so a veto role by the IPMC seems to have minimum danger > to the ASF system of checks and balances. > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 19, 2017, at 9:33 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > Next release we could exclude the doc site. Do build files like .sbt > require licenses? I suppose it can be done in comments. But again can we > push to next release > > > > Can other binding voters have a look? I know everyone is busy but hey, > tax day is past ;-) > > > > > > On Apr 18, 2017, at 1:00 PM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Luciano, > > > > Thanks for your review. I will file JIRAs regarding these files. They are > > project build files and documentation. > > > > Regards, > > Donald > > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> The PredictionIO community has voted that 0.11.0-incubating-rc2 to be > >> good > >>> for a source-only release. This thread is to facilitate a voting for > the > >>> IPMC before a final official source-only release. > >>> > >>> Vote result on dev@: > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/031ff6f98b3d5a54b716789bda5068 > >>> 1a0c821f1054218843ac5fcc77@%3Cdev.predictionio.apache.org%3E > >>> > >>> The original vote thread on dev@: > >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d1bf205404bf4e16e12f17209f4f20 > >>> 7722e554ee9e4139974812f8e4@%3Cdev.predictionio.apache.org%3E > >>> > >>> The release candidate Git commit is: > >>> e34a853d0e89baed09b3d3b0c25b244162a3bdea > >>> > >>> The release candidate Git tag is: > >>> v0.11.0-incubating-rc2 > >>> > >>> The source-only release candidate artifacts can be downloaded here: > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/predictionio/0.11.0- > >>> incubating-rc2/ > >>> > >>> Test results of RC2 can be found here: > >>> https://travis-ci.org/apache/incubator-predictionio/builds/220381611 > >>> > >>> Build instructions of previous versions can be used on this RC: > >>> http://predictionio.incubator.apache.org/install/install-sourcecode/ > >>> > >>> Maven artifacts are built from the release candidate artifacts above, > and > >>> are provided as convenience for testing with PredictionIO engine > >> templates. > >>> The Maven artifacts are provided at the Maven staging repo here: > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > >>> orgapachepredictionio-1016/ > >>> > >>> All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion = > >>> 0.11.0-incubating'. You can view them here: > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > >>> projectId=12320420&version=12338381 > >>> > >>> The artifacts have been signed with Key : 8BF4ABEB > >>> > >>> Please vote accordingly: > >>> > >>> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.11.0 release > >>> [ ] 0, neutral because... > >>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.11.0 release because... > >>> > >>> The vote will be open for 72 hours and close at 12pm PDT 4/16/2016. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Donald > >>> > >> > >> > >> I was running RAT on the source distribution and there are a lot of > unknown > >> licenses, some might be ok, but many are not, such as: > >> > >> *.sbt in projects and sub-projects > >> *.css in docs > >> > >> Other things like signatures, etc seems ok > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Luciano Resende > >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
