Gah, this is what I was trying to convey. But I don't think it's still 100% correct.
You need a minimum of 3 +1's Your net positive votes must be 3 (e.g. if you have a -1 and 5 total votes, the other 4 votes must be +1's) You need more +1's than -1's I'm not sure what is written better. (trying to be more anal than Josh, but just to make sure everyone agrees) John On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:54 PM Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > On 6/15/17 1:11 PM, Oliver B. Fischer wrote: > > > > Please note: > > This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes and > > no -1’s (see [4]). > > Just wanted to point out that your description of majority approval is > wrong. You need at least 3 +1's and more +1's than -1's. -1's are not > vetos in this case :) > > (since I had to be anal about it and correct you, let me take a look at > your RC too :P) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
