________________________________
From: Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com.INVALID> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 8:13 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: james.bog...@salesforce.com Subject: Re: Images in source code. Here: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/ ? ExifTool by Phil Harvey - Queen's University<http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/> www.sno.phy.queensu.ca The OS X package installs the ExifTool command-line application and libraries in /usr/local/bin. After installing, type "exiftool" in a Terminal window to run ... MG>Thank god for Opensource technologies that work MG>Vielen Danke Felix! and http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/XMP.html XMP Tags - Queen's University<http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/XMP.html> www.sno.phy.queensu.ca XMP Tags. XMP stands for "Extensible Metadata Platform", an XML/RDF-based metadata format which is being pushed by Adobe. Information in this format can be embedded ... (Thanks Google ;-) ) Regards Felix Am 15.06.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com<mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com>>: James and Team quick update I have factored rat-plugin to read XMP (an XML metadata-tagged file with embedded Image) i have tried adding metadata tags using the crippled freebie photoshop and could not find any way to add metadata tags to PNG, JPG or PSD as the File/FileInfo menu in freebie photoshop is hopelessly greyed out/disabled Im reading some blogs that exiftool<sp?> can add metadata tags to any existing image Any clues as to where to locate any tool that can add metadata tag to an Image would be appreciated Thanks, Martin ______________________________________________ ________________________________ From: Martin Gainty <mgai...@hotmail.com<mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com>> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 8:49 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org<mailto:general@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: Images in source code. is there anyway to run maven-rat-plugin to make sure ASF licensed assets are *not* being subverted by salesforce http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html Apache Rat™ Plugin for Apache Maven – apache-rat:rat<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html> creadur.apache.org apache-rat:rat. Note:This goal should be used as a Maven report. Full name: org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.13-SNAPSHOT:rat. Description: Apache Rat™ Plugin for Apache Maven – apache-rat:rat<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html> Apache Rat™ Plugin for Apache Maven – apache-rat:rat<http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html> creadur.apache.org apache-rat:rat. Note:This goal should be used as a Maven report. Full name: org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.13-SNAPSHOT:rat. Description: creadur.apache.org<http://creadur.apache.org> [http://www.apache.org/images/asf_logo.gif]<http://creadur.apache.org/> Apache Creadur - Apache Software Foundation<http://creadur.apache.org/> creadur.apache.org Welcome to Apache Creadur About Apache Creadur. This project started as just Rat, a release auditing tool good with licenses, coded in Java with plugins for Ant and Maven apache-rat:rat. Note:This goal should be used as a Maven report. Full name: org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.13-SNAPSHOT:rat. Description: ? Martin ______________________________________________ ________________________________ From: John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 9:46 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Images in source code. On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:20 PM Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: Hi James, Everything that is not explicitly called out in the top level NOTICE and LICENSE files are licensed under the Apache 2.0 license. Adding a file to this directory might mislead people into thinking that they need to perform more due diligence with other files in other directories. My advice is to *not* add anything. Let the images be licensed per the terms the top level LICENSE file. Agreed. What we do like to make sure is called out is if there is provenance that these images came from somewhere else. If these images were not created by you and were not already under apache license, then we would have a concern. Craig On Jun 2, 2017, at 2:20 PM, James Bognar <james.bog...@salesforce.com> wrote: Thanks! I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a LICENSE.txt file to the directory. Hopefully that's enough. On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: On 6/2/17 1:15 PM, James Bognar wrote: I just added several png files to the source tree of our podling. I created them myself. Are there any best-practices on how to mark these as Apache licensed? I'm not sure of a good way to track this. I'm not sure if png supports arbitrary metadata which could be edited. Some ways I've seen used elsewhere to try to better propagate license/ownership: * Comments on the issue-tracker issue that introduced them citing origin/source (typically for images that are copied, not created) * Entry in LICENSE/NOTICE (shouldn't be done unnecessarily, of course) * A README in the same directory with relevant info If the images are of the podling's creation, I wouldn't be particularly worried. The copyright notice on your source-release and LICENSE are sufficient to inform downstream consumers. Probably not the answer you're looking for, but hope it helps :) - Josh --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- James Bognar Craig L Russell c...@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
