On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Ruilong Huo <h...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi IPMC member, > > > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. We > kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. > > > The PPMC vote thread is located here: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ee0b81127e75eb2562e91b0a44d56b24165c6284a7a46dc03eeb7d6d@%3Cdev.hawq.apache.org%3E > > > The artifacts can be downloaded here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hawq/2.2.0.0-incubating.RC3/ > > > The artifacts have been signed with Key : 1B8B6872 > > > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion = > 2.2.0.0-incubating'. You can view them here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318826&version=12339641 > > > Please vote accordingly: > [ ] +1, accept as the official Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release > [ ] -1, do not accept as the official Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release > because...
I'm +1 on the release with one caveat: it seems that pxf RPMs don't deliver LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER. inside of the RPMs. Normally that would be enough for me to cast a -1, but it seems that the JARs inside of the RPMs (and these RPMs deliver JARs only) actually bundle the required files. My take it is that we shouldn't hold a release for that -- but I'll let the rest of IPMC chime in. The rest looks really good: * checked sigs and hashes * compared source tarball to the git tag * checked for license headers in the source * installed the RPMs Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
