Hi John, On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:11 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > ...Its unfair for us to put some stake in the ground expecting podlings to > match up 100% on the questions. Many of the questions are subjective - is > the code easy to discover? respond to bug reports in a timely manner?...
Ok, I think I understand your reluctance now: you don't want us to set a gate for graduating podlings that many TLPs might not pass. I agree with that, and although I'm a strong supporter of the Maturity Model (having initiated it that's understandable ;-) I'm totally ok with podlings graduating without fullfilling all of its requirements. In my view the model is: 1) A good tool to help discover areas that podlings might have neglected. 2) A good tool to help podlings look at where they stand, and what they might still need to improve after graduation. 3) A good tool to express our ideal way of doing things, in a concise way, and evolve that definition over time. Based on this I will continue to push for podlings to come to graduation with a self-assessment based on that model. OTOH I'm fine with us clarifying that it's not a requirement. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
