+1 (binding)

So far I've checked:
* signatures and digests
* source releases file layouts
* matched git tags and commit ids
* incubator suffix and disclaimer
* LICENSE & NOTICE files look good despite the many third-party code (CC-BY
files from RC2 are gone)
* no binary files in the source release
* clean build



On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Anirudh Subramanian <
anirudh2...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0, release
> candidate RC3.
> As suggested by Justin and Henri, we have removed the two category b
> license files: DevGuide.md from the release source tarball.
>
> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
>
> Vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fee7800da4b701cb62d6dd7c1b43ef
> d44c94a3a386f3adb48f343d6e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
> Results thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0a43205e47a02a528873e16fe0e578
> 9dfcfebc8a8539f17bbcde2062@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>
> The source tarball, including signatures, digests etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.2.0.rc3/
>
> The release tag can be found here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.0.rc3
>
> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.0.rc3>
> The release hash is 297c64fd2ee404612aa3ecc880b940fb2538039c and can be
> found here:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> 297c64fd2ee404612aa3ecc880b940fb2538039c
>
> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> 297c64fd2ee404612aa3ecc880b940fb2538039c>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 0D04 3D0F 92CA 7333 22A8  D131 9067 CC8E AF55 CD6D
>
> KEYS file available:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
>
> For information on the contents of the release see:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.2.0+Release+Notes
>
> The vote will end at 1:00 PM on Friday, May 18th, PDT.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.0
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
>
> Anirudh
>

Reply via email to