Hi Justin.

We used to have the same question, too. We discussed with ant-design community, 
here are their feedbacks could be found in GitHub.


1. The codebase of those fonts are here: ant-design/antd-init . They declared 
that free to use from their README[1].
2. For 100% confirm, our PMC submit an issue[2], their official member 
confirmed in MIT.


Is this good enough?


[1] 
https://github.com/ant-design/antd-init/tree/master/examples/local-iconfont#local-hosted-iconfont
[2] https://github.com/ant-design/ant-design/issues/10243


------------------
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking 


 




------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Justin Mclean"<justinmcl...@gmail.com>;
Date:  Wed, Jul 11, 2018 08:25 AM
To:  "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>;

Subject:  Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 
5.0.0-beta2[RC1]



Hi,

The license in the source release is boilerplate and contains no 3rd party
licenses.

How are those fonts licensed? It's not clear looking at the ant design
project that the fonts are under the same license as the ant design code.
In fact AFAICS the fonts are not included in that project. If this question
can be answered I'll reconsider my vote.

Thanks
Justin

On Wed., 11 Jul. 2018, 9:01 am ???? Sheng Wu, <wu.sh...@foxmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> Thanks for you review.
>
> These fonts[1] are from "ant-design" project, which is already list in our
> License file. I think the mistake is, we shouldn't add Apache head to that
> file, instead, we should add exclusion in rat and put some comments there
> too. Thanks for pointing this out.
>
>
> I want to ask, could we fix this issue in our next release?
>
>
> ------------------
> Sheng Wu
> Apache SkyWalking
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> From:  "Justin Mclean"<justinmcl...@me.com>;
> Date:  Wed, Jul 11, 2018 06:21 AM
> To:  "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>;
>
> Subject:  Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version
> 5.0.0-beta2[RC1]
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry but it??s -1 (binding) as it's unclear how the fonts [1] are licensed
> and they may be category X.
>
> The svg version of the fonts looks like it may of had an ASF apache header
> incorrectly added.
>
> For the source release I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE is missing license information for icon fonts [1]
> - NOTICE is OK
> - No unexpected binary files
> - all source files have headers
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1.
> apache-skywalking-apm-incubating-5.0.0-beta2/skywalking-ui/public/font/iconfont/iconfont.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to