I noticed the LICENSE and NOTICE files are boilerplate with no additions, but looking at /project/Dependencies.scala I see a number of dependencies with various licenses such as BSD and MIT. Is there a reason those components aren’t listed in the LICENSE file per [1]?
If this question has been answered before, I apologize, this is the first Three release I’ve reviewed. -Taylor [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > On Aug 9, 2018, at 12:13 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC6). > > The podling dev vote thread: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg01798.html > > And the result: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg01821.html > > Tag: v0.2.0-incubating-rc6 (eae2da61828a0c88e2ab64a7ffb9ff7647909a2c) > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-toree/tree/v0.2.0-incubating-rc6 > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found > at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/toree/0.2.0-incubating-rc6/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetoree-1013 > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP