Hi, I’m +1 (binding) on releasing the source package, but -1 on the binary. Assuming you get enough votes you could IMO just release the source artefact.
I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - LICENSE and NOTICE fine - DISCLAIMER exists - no unexpected binary files - can compile from source Two very minor things: - You might want to consider signing the release with an Apache email address. - What is contained in CREDITS is ally in NOTICE (in a slightly different form). - Please include build instructions in the released software and not a link to them. - At some point the documentation [1] should move to Apache infrastructure For the binary the LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER is missing and the LICENSE and NOTICE are also missing from META-INF in the jars. See the release policy on this. [2] Thanks, Justin 1. https://incubator-crail.readthedocs.org 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#distribute-other-artifacts --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
