On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 3:43 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 09:00, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 2:33 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 02:59, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 2:36 AM Justin Mclean < > jus...@classsoftware.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > >... > > > > > > > > > No one should be subscribed to the private list other than mentors, > > > PPMC > > > > > members and ASF members (who can subscribe to any private list). > > > > > > > > Strictly speaking, a (P)PMC may have invited guests subscribed to > their > > > > private@ list. This is quite unusual, but has some precedent. As you > > > note: > > > > all subscriptions to private@ should be reviewed/moderated. > > > > > > Do such invites need to be recorded somehow? > > > > > > > I don't see why they should. A community invites a person to their > private@ > > list. > > But how does the community decide to invite the person? > I would expect such decisions to be recorded on a mailing list. >
I've seen the discussion on a private@ list, and then the invite went out. So, sure: it's on a list. Again: not typical ... it's been too long for me to remember which list we did this on :) Might be possible to find subscribers to private@FOO that have no obvious connection to the FOO PMC. > That person subscribes, the moderator allows. Done. It isn't really a > > significant action. > > IMO allowing access to a private list is a significant act. > Po-tay-toe, po-tah-toe ... situational. I don't find it too significant, but also understand that's just me. Cheers, -g
