HI, > Don’t make a noncompliant binary release.
The project is (sadly) already doing this [1], they are hoping the licensing issue can be sorted, but its taken more than 5 months and little visible progress on that seems to have been done. NVIDIA is considering changing, but to what we don’t know. > Tell your users how to make a noncompliant build on their own knowing the > risks. They don’t want to do that, as it is too hard for users to compile. > Third parties like NVIDIA can make their own decision and release, but can’t > call it Apache MxNext, but have to use “powered by” if they use the brand. This has been brought many times by the IPMC over many months, but it seems they still seem to have branding and naming issues. [2] Thanks, Justin 1. https://pypi.org/project/mxnet/ 2. https://ngc.nvidia.com/catalog/containers/nvidia:mxnet
