It seems to me that knowing who has carryover votes is not important for a lazy
consensus vote.
The +1 votes are not really required except in the rare case they might be
needed to counter a -1; in which case I'd suggest intentional action following
the -1 would make more sense than saying "oh well, we had 4 carryover votes so
we can ignore the -1".
On 5/22/21, 8:44 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
Hi,
> I think that IPMC votes of Mentors must automatically carryover. (Means
the VOTE thread is clearly linked, not just RESULTS (This one was not.))
IMO The IPMC members (if any) who voted on the podlings dev list need to be
clearly stated in the vote email sent to the IPMC general list. The IPMC
composition changes over time and not listing them may make it difficult when
looking at historical votes.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
