Hi - > On Aug 6, 2021, at 6:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 2:43 PM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Branches for a purpose are appropriate... > > Absolutely agreed!
Ditto. Better one repository than 100s in most cases. (I understand why Sling is special ;-) ) > > But (to me) on GitHub the role of each branch can be hard to figure > out, so I think that needs to be explicitly documented. Yes. Since these status files will be moving out of SVN the new procedures will need documentation in several places - both Guides and READMEs. > > Using conventions for branch names might help, like website/clutch as > opposed to experiment/bertrands-crazy-stuff Yes that may be very helpful and will make staging this easier too. The branches are renamed: - status/projects - status/ip-clearance - status/clutch master is branched to preview/main Regards, Dave > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
