GOMEZ Henri at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> rsync should be your friend here :]
>>
>> Kinda... It takes 3 minutes just to check that the site is
>> up-to-date, while
>> with httpd and www it's a 20 seconds process... (From
>> Nagoya)... I still
>> think that reducing the size of it would be good....
>
> 3 minutes to check the whole site ?)
> What the files list size ?
I believe it's not the transfer time, as a `find` run on the directory
produces a list of approximately 2.2 megs, but there are 28733 entries, 2000
of them directories, and it's a major overkill for the disks on Locus...
Traversing over www.apache.org is way less heavy: it has a < than 100 kb
file list (1652 entries and 138 dirs), even though the site in itself is not
that small it's more than 1/2 a gig...
So, if we can keep things in a smaller scale, reducing dirs, that would be
cool... BTW, latest figures of _now_ ... RSYNC of www.apache.org (two in a
row, measured the second one) 1.3 secs. RSYNC of jakarta.apache.org (again
two in a row and measured the second one) 48 secs... (so, I measured two
rsyncs without updates, in theory!)
Pier
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
