On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 14:38, Nick Chalko wrote: > JJAR has stalled. but maybe restarting that is a good solution.
It's not a good idea. Again, it was started at my behest and I've absorbed everything in JJAR into Maven's mechanism. Which can be split out. > I think building outside of maven is a worthwhile because not every one uses > maven. > I would like to see the tools and standards developed be independent of the > build tool. It can be a separate tiny build and then anyone can use it. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:36 AM > To: Jakarta General List > Subject: Re: Clear the air Re: ATTN: Maven developers [was: primary > distri bution location] > > > JJAR in commons sandbox had some of these ideas in there... But can > you build this into maven rather than in parallel? -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
