robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
9 or somewhere else should speak to J2EE or other external config
requirments, which should be fine, even encouraged in some cases
is 9 needed? are any configuration guidelines needed?
if they are then i agree that they should encourage specification
compliance. would a general statement about specification compliance be
better?
Its not needed. The charter should be as simple as possible.
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
