[x]    Apache Silk

--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM:   jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: jmitchtx



On Aug 16, 2005, at 1:20 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:


Sorry for the 5 day instead of 1 day delay. Decided it was time to sell the house so have spent much time tidying up :)

Please vote from the following shortlist of names. Please ignore the Web vs Web App vs Webapp issue for the moment.


[ ]    Apache Silk [ ]    Apache Web Bricks
[ ]    Apache Web Commons (branding issue with Commons)
[ ]    Apache Web Components
[ ] Apache Web Parts (conflict with Microsoft and an sf.net project)


Assuming it doesn't degenerate into confusion, I'll end the vote on Sunday midday EST. 3 votes needed, simple majority wins.


(On Silk:
  Old name of JScheme back in the 90s. Unsure why they renamed.
  One of the potential names for Java:
    http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-10-1996/jw-10-javaname.html
)

--
Veto'd, either by lack of anyone pushing them forward when I listed options, or by what seemed to be good reasons:
----------------------------------------------------
Web Artifacts     - artifacts too vague
Web Modules       - modules too overloaded
Web League        - implications on community structure
Web Confederation - implications on community structure
Web Bloc          - ditto;
Webbies           - website awards
Weblets           - implies inheritable framework
Arctic, Telsa     - Too obscure
Web Tools - Clash with Eclipse, seems like it would be too close
Jakartlets        - Jakarta shouldn't be in the name
Web Libs          - Hard to say quickly :)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to