On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 14:57 +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote: > On 2/17/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 16:52 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > Given its database-centric nature, and the fact that it's a framework, > > this > > > would appear to be more appropriate for the Apache DB Project: > > Hmm.. okay. it isn't a large framework. but, okay.
jakarta commons does bricks not frameworks (however, it is possible that you are actually describing something which is an adaptive bridge brick and not technically a framework) > > > > > http://db.apache.org/ > > > > +1 but don't let that discourage you :) > > > jakarta isn't really accepting sub-projects any more: we're very slowly > > moving away from that model towards something flatter. > > > > - robert > > > > I was specifically referring to the Commons. Well, okay! :) it was the language that fooled me :) sub-projects are jakarta mini-me's with separate communities, mailing lists and so on. apache has found that sub-projects don't scale. components are the bricks the community happens to be working on. but martin's right that we try to push data access related proposals towards the db project. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
