On 9/3/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally I'd ask the reverse question of the Fisheye users. Can > OpenGrok serve the same purpose? > > If so, then we should stop using the commercial app and move to the open app.
Following up on similar comments made by various people on various threads, perhaps we should consider assembling a complete Java open source stack for use as an integrated development infrastructure. The stack could use Harmony and Derby as a foundation, with products like James, Tomcat, Daisy, Roller, EyeBrowse, OpenGrok, Scarab, and Continuum running in between. The product niche would compare to SourceForge, Google Code, CollabNet, and so forth. We could test and document the system, and bundle it up for distribution to the general public. (Perhaps relying on Maven as a distribution mechanism, a la AppFuse.) Of course, we could also make the platform available to interested ASF projects. Ultimately, some of us might be using the same development infrastructure at our day jobs that we use for Java work at the foundation. The Cocoon group is already running Daisy in a zone, and we also have a Continuum running in a zone, but here the idea is that we would have a full suite of ASF and related products running together, over Harmony, as a single offering. If we take the perspective that we are going to distribute the platform to the general public, and perhaps deploy the platform here for our own use, then the initiative would seem to fall within the scope of a PMC or lab. Thoughts? -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
