[X] -1, No because:
there are outstanding bugs that should be fixed and I would do that, but need
some time ("land-under-water" currently).
---rony
On 24.07.2011 08:27, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
> against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
> attic).
>
> [ ] +1, G'night BSF
> [ ] -1, No because:
>
> ----
>
> Per Sebb's statement:
>
> "Now that JSR-223 is part of Java 1.6 there is less need for BSF.
> There are no bugs oustanding against BSF 3.x. Not sure it is worth
> fixing any of the 2.x bugs."
>
> Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
