Re: [Jgeneral] significant digits

[Joey K Tuttle]

Sorry, I meant to say -

You disagree with that also?


At 18:09  -0700 2006/06/24, R&S HUI wrote:

It seems clear what I disagree with.



----- Original Message -----
From: Joey K Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, June 24, 2006 5:53 pm
Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] significant digits

 Better to fix it? Seems to me the following should produce
 the same results ...

    '0' 8!:2 ] 365365365365365365x^2
 133491850208566945040100911382265856
    0": 365365365365365365^2
 133491850208566926593356837672714240

 You disagree with that?


 At 17:10  -0700 2006/06/24, R&S HUI wrote:
 >  > IMHO, it would be a good idea to include a comment ...
 >
 >I disagree.

 > >

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm