Mark wrote: > (If this is how it is intended to work, I would class it as > "misfeature" instead.)
Yeah, I don't really like:
]&.:(>"0) <'hi' NB. Note &.: not &.
+-+-+
|h|i|
+-+-+
(-: ]&.:(>"0)) <'hi' NB. Hence...
0
either.
-Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
