On September 10, 2004 22:26, Net Llama! wrote: > On 09/10/2004 08:36 AM, Collins Richey wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:57:00 +0100, Terence McCarthy > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 10:26:06 -0500 (EST) > >> > >>Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>Lol. Are you sure this isn't the logic behind the Kerry Campaign > >>>> or the Bush Campaign? > >>> > >>>That would be giving either of them too much credit. > >> > >>No, just about enough. > > > > Sorry, recent events have overtaken us. The Kerry operatives have > > just hit an all-time logic deficit (not that the Bush campaign > > won't catch up, politics being what it is): all who believe that a > > document using current word processing techniques was typed in the > > 1970's by a military officer who didn't know how to type (per his > > wife) please go to the end of the line and try again. > > Where'd we'd find the bush campaign huxters with their 'official' > documents of his military record that uses a font that didn't exist > at the time.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2004/09/10/bush_memo040910.html I think you'll find that the "font" question is in reference to the same documents Collins was talking about, according to the article at the above link. At least, that's what I got from article. -- Myles Green <rmg57 at telus dot net> Slackware-current, Linux v2.6.8.1, Xorg v6.8.0, IceWM-1.2.16, ROX-Pinboard-2.1.3, Kontact-1.0 Promoting Linux and FLOSS since 1997 | Got root? _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsub/Pause/Etc -> http://mail.linux-sxs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
