Net Llama! wrote:

Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia - good... Bush spends 87 billion
in Iraq - bad...


I'm not clear on how either is good or bad.  Its the results that count.

And what result would that be? Are you speaking of the hundreds of schools and hospitals reopened and many towns with never-before clean water? Or the one woman from and undisclosed location whose TV quote spoke for the whole nation (with no context) in saying "it is worse than before". Most of us know that the TV Big-3 have a serious liberal bent, reproved by the Bush military Word documents.


Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden - good... World Trade Centers
fall under Bush - bad...


http://www.9-11commission.gov/

What is the point of that link? It points to the 9/11 commission site as of September 20th. It's a pretty big site, would you care to explain or make a more specific link?


Every year an independent tax watchdog group analyzes the average tax burden


on Americans, and then calculates the "Tax Freedom Day". This is the day
 after which the money you earn goes to you, not the government.

This year, tax freedom day was April 11th. That's the earliest it has been
since 1991. It's latest day ever was May 2nd, which occurred in 2000. Notice
anything special about those dates?


Yea, because Bush put the country back into debt to provide that date. Let's see how long it takes to climb back out of that debt.

Again, numbers please?

Recently, John Kerry gave a speech in which he claimed Americans are actually
paying more taxes under Bush, despite the tax cuts. He gave no explanation
and provided no data for this claim.


I'm paying higher taxes now than i was 4 years ago. And no, i don't mean just more taxes, I mean a higher tax rate. And even if my salary was identical to what it was 4 years ago, I'd still be paying more.

Numbers?  Source?

Another interesting fact: Both George Bush and John Kerry are wealthy men.
Bush owns only one home, his ranch in Texas. Kerry owns 4 mansions, all
worth several million dollars. (His ski resort home in Idaho is an old barn
brought over from Europe in pieces. Not your average A-frame).


So?

Bush paid $250,000 in taxes this year; Kerry paid $90,000. Does that sound
right? The man who wants to raise your taxes obviously has figured out a way to avoid paying his own.


And its Kerry's fault that his accountants are smarter than Bush's?


Given the democratic way of getting away with whatever they can, yes.

_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsub/Pause/Etc -> http://mail.linux-sxs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to