On Thursday 11 November 2004 03:00 pm, David Bandel wrote: > The way I see it (and how the discussions have _not_ gone on this > list) is there are well-defined issues and opinions (or navels) to go > with them. > > Perhaps we can get away from the "your candidate is a war-mongering > misfit" or "well yours is a yellow-bellied idiot" to something along > the lines of: �I agree with my candidate in that the only way to deal > with terrorism is to kill all the terrorists; or well, I think my > candidates option to negotiate with terrorists is a better policy. > > Now we have something to discuss rather than labels to dodge.
What are you trying to do.... throw reason into this argument?? <VBSEG> -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + Bruce S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bellaire, MI 11/11/04 17:05 + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Sutin's Second Law: "The most useless computer tasks are the most fun to do." _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsub/Pause/Etc : http://mail.linux-sxs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
