I think they could just be lumped into the lamp repo. Java if awful webby!
Phillip Smith wrote: > 2009/12/17 Markus M. May <mmay at javafreedom.org>: >> I think, that we need another repository for the Java Packages (e.g. >> OpenJDK, Jetty, Tomcat, Sonar, Hudson, ....). These are (at least >> from my perspective) some typical server components. >> >> What do you think? > > Does this really warrant a forth repo? Could they not be *loosely* > termed to be part of a "lamp" setup? ;) > > I'd be inclined to either put them into the lamp repo, or the base > repo rather than creating another repo... I'm thinking from a sys > admin point of view though and the maintenance and scripting required > to handle a 4th repo so if another repo is required, then I guess I'll > just have to suck it up :P > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > ArchServer Project General Mail List > Post messages to: general at lists.archserver.org > Administer your subscription: http://lists.archserver.org/listinfo/general > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.archserver.org/pipermail/general/attachments/20091216/43631519/attachment.html>
