> Quoting Moni Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: pkey change handling patch > > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> Quoting Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Subject: Re: pkey change handling patch > >> > >> Michael> I looked at cache.c and you are right. Maybe we should > >> Michael> either 1. report events after cache has been updated or > >> Michael> 2. make cache queries error out (EBUSY?) if cache hs not > >> Michael> updated yet. > >> > >> Michael> Option 1 requires core changes, option 2 - ULP changes > >> > >> Michael> I would be inclined to go for 2. Roland? > >> > >> Yes, I agree. How about ESTALE as an error code? > >> > > > > Looks OK. > > Moni, I think this should be a separate patch, > > and your pkey work on top of this. > > > Ok, I'll try to close that tomorrow.
So, this all turned out looking much more hairy than I thought it would be. Maybe option 1 is better? How about adding new types of events, and generating them once cache has been updated? -- MST _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
