On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 13:53, Bob Kossey wrote: > Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > >> > >> HP: Full ConnectX support, installation/packaging changes, > >> Perfmon independent of OpenSM. > >> > > > > What do you mean by "Perfmon independent of OpenSM" ? > > > > -- Hal > > > > > I interpreted from the exchange below that there is a dependency between > PerfMgr and OpenSM. If that is not accurate, or if it will be > eliminated, great.
PerfMgr will support the ability to run without the SM/SA function in OpenSM but with a "third party" SM (meaning any standard (vendor) SM which is IBA compliant although this will need testing to confirm that aspect by those vendors/parties interested in this). PerfMgr will, however, be part of the OpenSM package. I hope this clarifies the current intent. -- Hal > On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 03:24, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > >/ > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 14:23, Eitan Zahavi wrote: > />/ > > In the last months it is the second time I hear people > />/ > complaining the > />/ > > current monitoring solution in OFA is integrated with OpenSM. > />/ > > />/ > I must have missed this both times (didn't see this in Mark's > />/ > post) and the statement itself is somewhat inaccurate as well. > / > >/ Private talks - I hope they will speak up for themselves now... > / > Please encourage them to do so. > > >/ > > These people do not use OpenSM but do use OFED. > />/ > > />/ > I'm not sure I'm following what you mean here. > />/ > > />/ > If you mean that some people want to run PerfMgr without the > />/ > SM/SA aspects (so that they can run a vendor based SM), that > />/ > is the next thing we are adding to the implementation. > />/ Exactly. OK when is that coming? > / > Should be part of OFED 1.3. _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
