On 14:27 Fri 27 Jul , Eitan Zahavi wrote: > The problem I have with back-to-back plug is that it is a fatal case if > found in a case where there was no use of this plug. > So we will need some sort of user input if it is OK or not.
Ok, and let's add cl_qmap_count() check there. > The case of moving a port in the middle of a sweep can be easily > detected if instead of reporting an error a second > check of the original DR where the same GUID was found is performed... Do you mean to resend NodeInfo request to the original location? Assuming so, I guess it should be instead of second heavy sweep, and it is a good idea. The only small downside of this I can see is potential timeouts (and discovery slowdown). But anyway it is much better then fatal error. Thanks! Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
