> Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 V3] osm: QoS - adding QoS policy options > > On 8/30/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 V3] osm: QoS - adding QoS policy options > > > > > > On 8/30/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Quoting Hal Rosenstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 V3] osm: QoS - adding QoS policy options > > > > > > > > > > On 8/30/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > How are the use of flex and bison dealt with in Windows ? > > > > > > > > > > > > There are windows ports for these tools. Here are some links: > > > > > > http://www.mingw.org/MinGWiki/index.php/bison > > > > > > http://www.mingw.org/MinGWiki/index.php/flex > > > > > > > > > > Any license issue with those ? > > > > > > > > Why do you ask? > > > > > > Because we've run up against this before in a slightly different > > > context in Windows. > > > > Couldn't parse this. > > Anyway, I don't think there's any license issue here. > > They're GPL rather than LGPL so that should be the case.
So that's the case. No issues as long as you don't violate GPL. -- MST _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
