On 8/31/07, Sasha Khapyorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 06:58 Thu 30 Aug , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > > > > And when the setup part of the new QoS will be ready, would we still > > > > want > > > > the SL2VL and VLArb tables to appear in the opts file? > > > > > > Don't think. Why we need it in two places? > > > > Are you saying that the existing QoS will get these tables from the > > new QoS syntax (and the existing syntax eliminated) ? > > Yes. I think it is better than to keep two potentially conflicting > configurations. > > > If so, what > > about backward compatibility ? Also, how straightforward is it to > > specify the equivalent as the existing syntax ? Will a conversion tool > > be supplied ? > > Not sure it is needed - it is just few lines of text now.
The new equivalent syntax ? -- Hal > > Sasha > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
