On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:07:20 +0000 Sasha Khapyorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13:41 Sat 17 Nov , Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > Also, this same kind of unification is needed for GID's. They should > > always be printed and accepted in IPv6 format, not 128 bit > > decimal. > > Not sure this was discussed explicitly (probably it should be). My > feeling based on the feedback from people (emails, opened bugs, etc) > was that desired *IDs formats are decimal for LIDs, LMC and hexadecimal > for GUIDs, MLIDs. This sounds good. Add comma separated decimal for Directed paths. (for example from opensm.log output "Initial path: 0,1,2") > > I don't remember that GID was discussed at all and I think that Jason's > proposition about ipv6 format is first here. > > Any other opinions? Should *IDs formats be formalized at all? Thoughts? > Yes I believe ID's should be formalized. Ira _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
