What I mean "claim to support" is to have more people to test with this config.
--CQ > -----Original Message----- > From: Or Gerlitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:18 PM > To: Tang, Changqing > Cc: general@lists.openfabrics.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [ewg] OFED March 24 meeting > summary on OFED 1.4 plans > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Tang, Changqing > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The problem is, from MPI side, (and by default), we don't > know which > > port is on which fabric, since the subnet prefix is the > same. We rely > > on system admin to config two different subnet prefixes > for HP-MPI to work. > > > > No vendor has claimed to support this. > > CQ, not supporting a different subnet prefix per IB subnet is > against IB nature, I don't think there should be any problem > to configure a different prefix at each open SM instance and > the Linux host stack would work perfectly under this config. > If you are a ware to any problem in the opensm and/or the > host stack please let the community know and the maintainers > will fix it. > > Or. > _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
