>I also agree but I remember at one point we got pushback from >one of the mainline kernel developers who really wanted to see >only one return point in the code even if it meant more gotos. >I don't remember who though.
I think the coding style document calls out using a single return point, but I don't think that's always the cleanest approach either. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general