On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 20:47 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > On 10:09 Wed 25 Jun , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 19:55 +0300, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > > It was discussed on the list (and even marked as a bug in bugzilla) > > > that unicast LIDs should be represented in decimal form in logs. > > > > Are all the other unicast LID print instances in OpenSM being changed > > too ? > > No, and now it is good time to do.
Sure but is anyone ? > > I think hex consistency is better than a piecemeal approach. > > I'm fine with both approaches - do all at once or step by step. In any > case convert to "deprecated" format doesn't seem reasonable for me. IMO it's more confusing to the log reader to mix and match unicast LID formats. -- Hal > Sasha > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
