On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 16:09 -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> diff --git a/libibmad/src/portid.c b/libibmad/src/portid.c
> index 7279e14..01f9530 100644
> --- a/libibmad/src/portid.c
> +++ b/libibmad/src/portid.c
...
> @@ -65,29 +66,24 @@ char *
>  portid2str(ib_portid_t *portid)
>  {
>         static char buf[1024] = "local";
> +       char drpath[512];
>         char *s = buf;
>         int i;
>  
>         if (portid->lid > 0) {
>                 s += sprintf(s, "Lid %d", portid->lid);
>                 if (portid->grh_present) {
> -                       s += sprintf(s, " Gid 0x%" PRIx64 "%" PRIx64,
> -                                       ntohll(*(uint64_t *)portid-
> >gid),
> -                                       ntohll(*(uint64_t *)(portid-
> >gid+8)));
> +                       char gid[sizeof
> "ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff"];
> +                       inet_ntop(AF_INET6, portid->gid, gid, sizeof
> (gid));
> +                       s += sprintf(s, " Gid %s", gid);

Should this be:
                if (inet_ntop(AF_INET6, portid->gid, gid, sizeof (gid))
                        s += sprintf(s, " Gid %s", gid);

>                 }

Also, I'm all for this change but I'm also for consistency (I may be a
minority of one on this) so I have to ask whether you plan on updating
diags and/or OpenSM for GID format.

Note also that if this is ported to Windows a wrapper for inet_ntop will
be needed.

-- Hal

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to