On 09:02 Wed 09 Jul , Tziporet Koren wrote: > Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: >> Hi Tziporet, >> >> On 18:01 Sun 06 Jul , Tziporet Koren wrote: >> >>> This is the list of libraries in OFED >>> We wish to define which are the libraries that are public and their API >>> is being preserved from release to release. >>> >> >> I agree with this concept and suggest to keep only "public" and "others" >> lists. Actually to have only "public" list (libraries with stable API) >> should be enough. >> >> >>> There are libraries I already classified, and there are some I am not >>> sure about >>> Each owner - please reply regarding the libraries that are under unknown >>> Also - if I missed any library please add it to the list >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tziporet >>> >>> Public: >>> ======= >>> * libibcommon >>> >> >> I wanted to remove (merge with libibumad and libibmad) libibcommon yet >> in OFED 1.3 (we discussed this on the list). Not sure I will be able to >> do it now (in OFED 1.4 timeframe), but at least let's move it from >> "public" list. >> >> > Has anyone using this library now?
Nobody directly (AFAIK), but via libibumad. I guess -libcommon is listed as part of LDFLAGS in some ibutils Makefile (this is why I didn't want to make a "noise" during 1.3 release cycle). > If not we can remove it to the private list I would suggest to not have a "private" list at all - only "public". Basically I see nothing wrong in using a "private" libraries by others. Just think that it should be clear which OFED libraries have stable API. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
