Hey Hal, On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 21:54 -0400, Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Hi Al, > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Al Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Sasha, > > > > Specifies the -l option in these respective scripts when they call > > perfquery to clear counters/errors. This is the core of why I > > implemented the -l option in perfquery. These two tools were failing in > > a chunk of our switches. > > > > Note that these scripts specify -R (reset only) for perfquery, so there > > aren't any issues with multiple perfquery outputs that may need to be > > parsed multiple times/differently. > > But this takes many more resets to work, right ? Why not have loop > ports (for reset) only do this is all ports is not supported ?
I just re-read this sentence, now I get what you're asking. I made -- loop_ports only loop if AllPortSelect isn't supported. So if the switches already support AllPortSelect, the number of resets should be the same. Al > > -- Hal > > > > > Al > > > > -- > > Albert Chu > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Computer Scientist > > High Performance Systems Division > > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > [email protected] > > http:// lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > To unsubscribe, please visit http:// > > openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general > > > -- Albert Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
