Hi Sasha,
Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
Hi Yevgeny,
On 23:29 Wed 15 Oct , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
I'm sending v2 of the patches:
All applied. Thanks.
The job that still needs to be done:
- Check how the cache handles port moving during discovery.
Might be a bug there.
- Check how unicast manager handles fast reset of switches.
AFAIK SM will now write the LFT there - need to fix it
(unrelated to cache, general ucast mgr issue)
Seeing again at this I think that it handles this properly. This is
the code in osm_ucast_mgr_set_fwd_table():
Right, I noticed it too.
if (!p_sw->need_update &&
!memcmp(block, p_sw->lft_buf + block_id_ho * 64, 64))
continue;
- Optimize LFT usage - simplify current switch LFT,
I've already done this - two patches were posted to list
couple of days ago.
hold two LFTs (current and cached) only when these LFTs
are not identical.
I already have a draft for this too - it's very short.
Waiting for the LFT simplification patches to be applied
first.
-- Yevgeny
This would be a nice improvement.
Sasha
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.openfabrics.org
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
