> > PATCHv6 is the latest version. Should we use it? > > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2008-December/055727.html > > > And it could be nice if cma_zero_addr patch, will be accepted too. > >OK, thanks. What is the final version of the cma_zero_addr() change? I >do agree it makes sense it makes sense to use ipv6_addr_any() instead of >duplicating the code. Have you and Sean agreed on it?
I've acked his patch. - Sean _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
